Skip to main content
Bengals
2-2 · 24.2 pts/g
Preview · week 5
24–18
projected score · Sun 11 Oct 18:00 UK · 1:00 PM ET
Dolphins
0-4 · 11.5 pts/g
Model
CIN 69%
Market
CIN 75%
Model pickCIN 69%Medium confidence
F&D score76out of 100
MarketCIN 75%draftkings, margin removed
vs market-6.0points, model minus market
Total42.1CIN by 5.8

This looks like a close contest, but we give a slight edge to CIN. MIA have been struggling, dropping 4 of their last 4.

Matchups to watch

How each player gets his production, set against how this opponent has defended it over their last 17 games. After the game we grade who won each one.

Ja'Marr Chase · against MIA

Best way in: intermediate throws

Profile

Where his targets come from

Share of his targets. The white tick is the league average.

Short (under 10)
62%
Intermediate
29%
Deep (20+)
9%
Left side
41%
Middle
24%
Right side
35%

How MIA defend it

Ranked of 32, last 17 games. Green is a weakness to attack.

Short (under 10)
26th
Intermediate
31st
Deep (20+)
2nd
Left side
13th
Middle
29th
Right side
28th
Yards after catch allowed
21st
Sack rate forced
20th
The read
  1. Miami rank 31st against intermediate throws, which make up 29% of Chase's targets.
  2. Work the middle: 24% of his targets go that way and Miami rank 29th defending throws there.
  3. Free data doesn't show who covers whom on each snap, so this is the defence's profile, not a confirmed one-on-one.
Malik Washington · against CIN

Best way in: short throws

Profile

Where his targets come from

Share of his targets. The white tick is the league average.

Short (under 10)
72%
Intermediate
12%
Deep (20+)
17%
Left side
46%
Middle
15%
Right side
38%

How CIN defend it

Ranked of 32, last 17 games. Green is a weakness to attack.

Short (under 10)
32nd
Intermediate
13th
Deep (20+)
13th
Left side
32nd
Middle
18th
Right side
24th
Yards after catch allowed
32nd
Sack rate forced
10th
The read
  1. Cincinnati rank 32nd against short throws, which make up 72% of Washington's targets.
  2. Don't force deep balls: they've been Washington's worst return (-0.70 EPA a target), and Cincinnati are 13th there.
  3. Work the left side: 46% of his targets go that way and Cincinnati rank 32nd defending throws there.
  4. Free data doesn't show who covers whom on each snap, so this is the defence's profile, not a confirmed one-on-one.
Malik Willis · against CIN

A pass defence to exploit

Profile

How CIN defend it

Ranked of 32, last 17 games. Green is a weakness to attack.

Short (under 10)
32nd
Intermediate
13th
Deep (20+)
13th
Left side
32nd
Middle
18th
Right side
24th
Yards after catch allowed
32nd
Sack rate forced
10th
The read
  1. Cincinnati rank 26th in EPA per dropback allowed over their last 17 games, and 32nd against short throws.
  2. Pressure: Cincinnati are 10th at getting sacks, and Miami are 27th at avoiding them.

Unit by unit

Each unit ranked against all 32 teams on 2026 play-by-play through week 4. Longer bar is better; a gold rank marks the side with the edge.

When the Bengals have the balloffence against defence, rank of 32 (1st is best)
CIN offence
MIA defence
OverallEPA per play
10th
28th
PassingEPA per dropback
14th
30th
RushingEPA per carry
18th
6th
Third downconversion rate
7th
28th
Pass protectionsack rate: allowed vs forced
14th
28th

Biggest gap: third down, where the Bengals offence has a 21-place edge.

When the Dolphins have the balloffence against defence, rank of 32 (1st is best)
MIA offence
CIN defence
OverallEPA per play
30th
10th
PassingEPA per dropback
27th
10th
RushingEPA per carry
27th
14th
Third downconversion rate
16th
23rd
Pass protectionsack rate: allowed vs forced
27th
3rd

Biggest gap: pass protection, where the Bengals defence has a 24-place edge.

Only 4 weeks of data so far: treat ranks as a direction, not a verdict.

Form and history

Last 2 meetingsCIN 2 · MIA 0
45-21CIN at MIA
2025-12
15-27MIA at CIN
2022-09

Injury report

Bengalsmodel impact 0.0
Andrei IosivasWR · ThumbIR
Jalen DavisCB · HamstringIR
Ja'Sir TaylorDBIR
Ja'Marr ChaseWR · ConcussionQuestionable
Tee HigginsWR · GroinQuestionable
Colbie YoungWR · KneeQuestionable
Swayze BozemanLB · GroinQuestionable
B.J. HillDT · AchillesQuestionable
Bryan CookDB · AnkleQuestionable
Kyle DuggerDB · QuadricepsQuestionable
Dolphinsmodel impact 0.0
Reese TaylorCB · QuadricepsOut
De'Von AchaneRB · Knee - ACLIR
Cole TurnerTEIR
Darrell BakerCBPUP
Storm DuckCB · KneePUP
Kyle LouisLB · KneeIR
Trey MooreLB · AnkleIR
Kenneth GrantDL · LegIR
Rene KongaDLIR
Ronnie HarrisonDB · HamstringIR
Caleb DouglasWR · AnkleQuestionable
Rob BealLB · HamstringQuestionable

Player props

Every posted line with the market's view and each player's last ten games against it.

Player props for this game haven't been posted by the books yet. They usually land Thursday to Saturday.

The betting view

Posted odds, the same odds with the bookmaker's margin removed, and where the model disagrees.

CIN odds1.28
MIA odds3.80
CIN fair odds1.34
MIA fair odds3.97
Model vs marketMIA +6.0
Kelly stake (capped)0.0%
Bookdraftkings
Rest0d

Read this before you bet: picking winners is not beating the price. At posted odds our 2025 flat-bet ROI was −6.9%. Use the model as one view of the game, not a tip.

What the model sees

Model favors CIN (69%) by 5.8 points.